Everything that is wrong with Cairngorm Mountain.

December 11, 2019 Graham Garfoot 3 comments

This post reveals two further examples of how CairnGorm Mountain is being mismanaged.  These confirm that there is something rotten at both Highlands & Islands Enterprises (HIE) and Cairngorm Mountain Scotland Ltd (CMSL).   Both these organisations are in desperate need of a clean-out if what was once Scotland’s premier ski resort is to return to its former glory.

 

HIE/CMSL’s response to business interest in the lower Coire na Ciste area.

It was a fairly open secret that an approach had been made to HIE by a business to re-open the lower part of Coire na Ciste.  The question of the possibility of the Ciste being sub-leased to another business was then raised in a post on the Aviemore & Glenmore Community Trust (A&GCT) Facebook page on 29/10/2019.  The A&GCT said it had heard the rumours circulating locally about this but on asking HIE about the subject, HIE had denied that they were in discussion with anyone.  It had previously been established through Freedom Of Information (FOI) requests that CMSL ARE allowed to sub-lease, BUT, only with the expressed written consent of HIE.

I  decided to double check the position and therefore submitted an FOI request to HIE on 31st October.  I received a response on 28th November which revealed there had been  email exchanges with not just one business but TWO!  E-mail from enquirer 1 with redactions and E-mail from enquirer 2 with redactions.  They raise a number of serious issues.

First, in response to a question from Enquirer 1 about the possibility of leasing the Ciste dated 3rd November last year,  Dave Macleod, HIE’s Head of Infrastructure, made a brief reply on 12/11/2018:

“HIE has a lease of the ski area with CML, including Coire na Ciste, which expires in 2039.”

This was at the very time that the HIE Board was planning how to take back CML into public ownership!   The HIE board meeting of 30/10/2018, which considered this,  lists those present as including Dave Macleod (and Paul Dzialowski who was also involved in the responses)!

The minutes effectively say that negotiations were already underway to cancel the HIE/ NAIL lease agreement so why did HIE staff suggest otherwise?

Second, the first email enquiry was made just four days before HIE released their new vision for Cairn Gorm as set out in the SE Group Report (see here).   Following this, Susan Smith, who is now the interim CEO of CMSL and at the time was HIE’s Head of Business Development  was quoted in the press (see here) as claiming that it would be nice if a “philanthropic investor” would be prepared to invest in the mountain business!    What the emails show is that there were  two potential investors and HIE/ CMSL have said no to both of them without asking any further!

WHY?  Was it because these businesses were interested in the Ciste, which HIE has been trying to shut down for years, or was it  because they were  afraid that another business might be so successful that it would show them up?

Third, in the case of the second enquirer HIE appears to have realised they were wrong to shut down the dialogue because a few days later they suggested the second enquirer could contact CMSL:

You will notice lines across the emails, this is a result of them being cut and pasted in chronological order.

This suggests that when HIE was initially contacted by the second enquirer they should have immediately referred the interested parties to CMSL with their business ideas and not taken it upon themselves to shut down the discussion. What they did was prejudice the business case before it was even presented to CMSL! The correct course of events would have been for the interested parties to present their case to CMSL management, who should then have presented it to their board for approval or refusal. In the case of approval, the business case should then have been presented to HIE for consent.

Fourth, as the extract above shows, there are obviously emails missing regarding the second enquiry between the 07/01/2019 and 13/05/2019.  These were presumably between CMSL and the business proposer – another FOI beckons!

 

HIE’s response to suggestion that heather cutting might help beginner’s ski area

While I have been very critical of the beginner’s ski area proposal (see here) I am a strong supporter of downhill skiing at Cairn Gorm.  Some of you may remember from a previous post  that I had investigated the option of “heather-cutting” instead of the bulldozing for the new beginner’s ski area which is now due to be considered by the Cairngorms National Park Authority Planning Committee on Friday.

I presented the idea to Carroll Buxton, interim CEO of HIE, and Susan Smith, interim CEO of CMSL over a month ago with the genuine belief that it would help in preparing a better beginner’s area for this year than if nothing was done. Here are my suggestions and their responses highlighted in yellow:

You will notice in the reply that the term “heather cutting” has been changed to “heather brashing” and is used repeatedly throughout the reply, a clear attempt to divert attention from the fact that CMSL has done absolutely nothing to help themselves. Let me explain.

Heather brashing is generally considered to be only the removal of the flower/ seed part of the plants, the brashings so obtained being spread on other areas to help with repair and rejuvenation after works which have damaged the natural environment.

Heather cutting, on the other hand and was what I proposed, can mean anything from taking 1cm. off the top to removing it completely to ground level, and despite CMSL’s insistence would have improved the beginners area.

Picture from CMSL. 30/11/2019
Picture from CMSL 28/11/19 showing extent of heather

“It will not change the problem of the existing open ditch”.  That is correct, but, with a bit of lateral thinking, cut heather could have been used to temporarily fill in or cover the ditch in the more important places for the duration of the ski season thereby improving the skiability of the lower slopes.

“Heather brashing is used within Cairngorm Ski Area and will continue to be used”, but, if you go back a couple of sentences “The lower area within the planning application was already heather brashed in 2015.” Four years previously! And then “Existing people within this company are best placed and have the knowledge of what is required to make the ski area better”.

My emailed reply to this was:-

“Miss Smith,

I am appalled and astonished at the level of arrogance displayed in your reply to my suggestion for heather cutting, considering the dire financial position of Cairngorm Mountain Scotland Ltd.”

“CMSL wanted to carry out these works in August so we are not at odds with “Working with the environment at Cairngorm” which we submitted as part of this (planning) application.”

If CMSL wanted to carry out the works in August 2019 then the planning application should have been entered long before the Date of Validation by the Planning Authority which was 30/07/2019, only days before you intended starting work, and which is still being added to! The document referred to here was written by Mr K. Bryers on 14/02/2018 and in part 4.4 specifically says “Works involving excavations should ideally be done in the late spring; completion of earthworks should be aimed for mid-June for the highest sites with re-instatement 2 – 3 weeks later……… and to allow the maximum growing season for the plants”. August is neither late spring nor mid-June.”

 

Conclusions

Everyone affected by the ongoing crisis at Cairngorm should be taking notice of the economy with the truth displayed and be careful in their dealings with management at HIE and CMSL.

“The head of the CNPA planning department has recommended this application for approval.”  If CMSL can’t even be bothered to help themselves and improve the beginner area with something as simple as heather cutting, let’s hope that the CNPA board stick to their guns when considering the Planning Application for the beginner’s area on Friday and insist HIE/ CMSL present their “Masterplan” before any further planning approvals are granted.

Senior management at both HIE and CMSL were employed when the company CML was first taken over by HIE in 2008, to prevent bankruptcy.  They were still in place when it nearly went bust in 2017, and eventually did go bust in 2018, and are still there now apparently quite happy wasting public money. It is my belief that the situation will never improve unless there is a radical change in attitude by them.

3 Comments on “Everything that is wrong with Cairngorm Mountain.

  1. Graham, it’s the classic not invented here syndrome. You’ve demonstrated yet again that HIE and CMSL just don’t want to listen to well-meant ideas. How ridiculous of them to suggest they wanted to do the work in August of this year after only submitting the planning application on 30 July. How ridiculous of them to give you multiple rejections to heather cutting as a short term solution.
    Regarding the Ciste, yet another missed opportunity to generate some business. For HIE to reject these advances out of hand should make everyone question why HIE is called an enterprise agency. I can almost understand that CMSL might not want competition on the doorstep to Coire Cas, but it is very easy in a sub-letting contract to restrict the type of activity permitted. Yet again HIE should have at least explored the opportunities.
    Yes, there needs to be a total change in behaviours in HIE and CMSL over Cairn Gorm, but in my view the only answer is to remove HIE from ownership of the whole Cairn Gorm estate as soon as is practicable.

    1. HIE is funded out of taxpayers money. HIE is accountable to Cabinet Secretary Fergus Ewing – i.e. the Scottish Government, however as it is the public who fund them, HIE should be accountable to us!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *