Will a change of convener at the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority make a difference?

December 17, 2022 Nick Kempe 12 comments

James Stuart, the convener of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA), has to step down in February having been on the board for eight years. At the LLTNPA Board Meeting on Monday Heather Reid – the former broadcaster known to many as Heather the Weather – was elected to replace him. That presents an opportunity for the LLTNPA board to become far more effective than it has been under Mr Stuart’s leadership.

Mr Stuart’s regime – spin and no substance

The LLTNPA issued a news release following the Board Meeting about the change in convener (see here) which epitomises the public facing part of Mr Stuart’s period of office:

“I’d like to be the first to congratulate Heather on her appointment as Convener. It has been a huge privilege to have been able to serve in that role for the last six years and I believe Heather will be able to take the Park Authority to even greater heights.

All self-congratulations and no self-criticism.  And what heights are those?

“His eight years on the National Park Board saw the Park Authority responding to considerable growth in visitor numbers, the Covid-19 pandemic and growing urgency to act on the climate and nature crises.”

That just about sums it up.  The  “Visitor Management season Review” (see here) presented to the meeting on Monday partially contradicted the claim about growth in visitors, reporting numbers had reduced this year and showing that the numbers of boats being registered on Loch Lomond had reduced considerably.

How well the LLTNPA has managed visitors or responded to the Covid pandemic – I don’t deny this was difficult – are moot points but they quietly ditched any idea of renewing their much delayed  (see here) and vacuous (see here) outdoor recreation plan in the summer .

As for the climate and nature crises, “growing urgency” has not resulted in action.  On the same day as the Board meeting the LLTNPA advertised a contract for a baseline review of the state of nature in the National Park (see here):

20 years after it was created, the LLTNPA still lacks basic information about the state of nature in the National Park!

I will come back to the LLTNPA’s Future Nature Route Map, which was discussed on Monday, in due course.  In some ways it is a significant step forward but it has taken over two years to develop despite the nature crisis and still nothing really meaningful has been delivered.

The LLTNPA now has a Future Nature Development Manager. Contrast that, however, with the 58 seasonal rangers employed this year. Without more staff working on the right issues, the LLTNPA will not do anything meaningful to address the climate and nature crises.  Mr Stuart had an opportunity to change that and stop the LLTNPA  wasting enormous amounts of money on trying to enforce the disastrous camping byelaws and on “marketing.  He chose not to rock the boat.  The result has been another six wasted years for the LLTNPA.

National Parks and freeports – a difficult balancing act

It was not until I saw that Mr Stuart had been appointed to the Lake District National Park Authority since his move to England (see here) that I realised he was also involved in the Tees Valley Authority.  As a regular reader of Private Eye since the pandemic, I almost choked on my porridge.  The Tees Valley Authority and its buccaneering mayor, Ben Houchen, features in almost every issue – including the current Xmas edition:

Mr Houchen, is something of a hero to the the extreme right in this country having breached the so called red wall.  The proposals by Kwasi Kwarteng during his brief time as chancellor to extend the number of freeports appear to have been very much modelled on what was going on on Teeside (where two new freeports were proposed}.

Besides the £ millions of public money being given to developers to restore the former steel works, the dredging of the Tees appears to have caused or contributed to a massive environmental disaster which public agencies in England are still denying (see here).

Mr Houchen has promised to compensate all the fisher folk who have last their livelihoods because of the deaths of crustaceans along the coast – one wonders if it will eventually affect Scotland – but refused to stop the dredging until an inquiry can be held. He and the developers around him appear to have no interest in protecting the natural environment or wildlife and no regard for the precautionary principle.

From meeting minutes I have established that Mr Stuart joined the Tees Valley Combined Authority Audit and Governance Committee sometime in the summer of 2021.  This was as an “independent member” and according to his register of interests this role is not remunerated.   Why Mr Stuart joined what appears to be a rogue outfit is unclear.  Perhaps he thought he could stop the abuse of public monies and the environment near his home in Darlington? If so, I look forward to reading in Private Eye on how he blew the whistle on Mr Houchen.

One wonders whether the Scottish Government, who have strongly opposed freeports in Scotland, have been aware of Mr Stuart’s involvement in the Teeside Authority and what they think this says about his commitment to the statutory aims of Scotland’s National Parks?

 

The challenge facing Heather Reid

Under AOB at the board meeting on Monday, the locally elected member for Balloch and south west Loch Lomond, Sid Perrie, tried to raise a matter that parkswatch has highlighted many times.  Why does the LLTNPA not provide every board member an email so they can be contacted by the public as happens in other National Parks?  He was not supported by a single other board member.

James Stuart, who has an email as a member of the Lake District National Park Authority, could have referred to practice there and used his position as chair to urge other board members to adopt what is seen as basic good practice in other National Parks.  Instead he kept his silence and the matter did not even get to the vote.

Five of the board members nominated by Scottish Ministers were  re-appointed for a second four year term in October without their jobs being re-advertised.  Sadly these members appear to regard themselves as only beholden to Scottish Ministers and to be above engaging with the general public.  That did not stop the LLTNPA marketing team issuing a Xmas video (see here) later in the week – further confirmation of the Park’s priorities under Mr Stuart – in which the LLTNPA claim not just to be “supporting local communities” but “listening to young people”.  How locally elected and Scottish Government nominated members do this when when they won’t even agree to having contact emails is unclear.

It appears, however, Mr Perrie’s attempted intervention has had some effect’ The following has very recently been added to the LLTNPA website (see here):

Unfortunately this arrangement means any correspondence to Board Members – including whistle-blowing by staff about their managers – will first be seen by senior management!  It is therefore not fit for purpose.  Moreover, this offer is not open to people who wish to contact the Scottish Government nominees on the Board.

One hopes that Heather Reid, who appears to lack much of Mr Stuart’s baggage,  will show real leadership when she assumes the convener role in February and seek support from Lorna Slater, the Minister for National Parks, to reform the governance of the LLTNPA.  She could also do worse than talk to Xander McDade, convener of the Cairngorms National Park Authority, about what they have been trying to do to improve openness and the accountability.  Judging by how the LLTNPA board reacted on Monday it appears she faces quite a challenge.

This may not, however, all be the fault of Board Members.  From the moment they are appointed, senior management at the LLTNPA drum into them at induction training that they are accountable to Scottish Ministers not the public and stress their role is confined to a very limited range of tasks. There is nothing in the law to say this should be the case, its all part of the insidious centralisation of power in Scotland, but as a result Board Members serve very little useful purpose and many appear to see the appointment as money for old rope.

One of the councillors appointed by Scottish Ministers in the summer, Hazel Sorrell from West Dunbartonshire Council, has missed her first two board meetings.  Perhaps she is ill? But a little more accountability to the public might help sharpen board members act and weed out those who shouldn’t be there.

The even bigger challenge for Heather Reid is that if the LLTNPA Board is incapable of seeing the need for even minor reforms in the way it operates, what hope for it successfully tackling the big issues like climate change?

12 Comments on “Will a change of convener at the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority make a difference?

  1. Thanks Nick, very interesting, and lots to chew over.
    As a Private Eye subscriber too, I am amazed that the National Park has never been reported on in Rotten Boroughs…
    I note that James Stuart has been in Montreal this week for COP, and would be intrigued to see which hat he was wearing – Tees Valley? Lake District? RYA? Loch Lomond? or more likely just his personal consulting business! No doubt his trip was payed for with taxpayers pounds.
    With regards to Heather Reid, it seems like she has been destined for the role since she joined the board, as she appeared in the press releases with the newly elected members earlier this year. I do wonder whether she will resign from her role on the SNH board now too.

  2. no, it will not make any difference at all. Employing more of the ‘usual suspects’ type of bureaucrat will just further entrench the inadequacy of the current park structure.

  3. Of course appointing a minor celebrity will not make a positive difference. She has no doubt been thoroughly vetted to make sure she is completely harmless and “on message” before being appointed.
    Not surprising that the boat registrations have dropped – why would anyone bother with Loch Lomond which is infested with PWC and speedboat neds and have to deal with the unwelcome interactions with their pointless “rangers” and their plethora of “No” signs when just over the hills is the Clyde estuary and West coast, same and better scenery and an absolute right of navigation without interference (at least for a few years yet ahead of the ever growing Marine Protected Areas) and a far better choice of shore facilities.
    The news that a byelaw update means that from next year they can demand to see ID was the last straw for me – I know staying away is furthering their agenda to get rid of private boats but life is too short to allow them to spoil my leisure time.

    1. Hi Niall, I have been meaning to cover the review of the water byelaws and how the LLTNPA is mismanaging Loch Lomond for some time now and hope to write soon. Its not too later to stop some of the stupid changes being proposed. Nick

      1. Hi Nick, as your articles on the doings of LLTPA make clear they have pretty much abandoned any pretence of accountability.
        Every year more of the loch is buoyed off on spurious “environmental” grounds with warnings of draconian penalties for transgression.
        Having worked over the years to reduce the number of launching points on the loch, forcing practically everyone to use the Balloch slipway which is as a result hopelessly inadequate on a sunny weekend, they now close it at least one weekend a year in the season for a swimming event which could easily be held elsewhere. I suspect that one reason for this is to reinforce the principle that your access to the loch is at their behest.
        For years I have avoided launching or retrieving at Balloch at weekends due to the chaos made worse by Rangers running around like headless chickens – at least during the week they leave you to get on with it.
        It is not a normal part of leisure boating to be stared at through powerful binoculars by a group in paramilitary style uniforms in a big black RIB – but on Lomond it is.
        Similarly if you go ashore for any reason in the islands you are liable to be accosted by more of the same who will engage you in pointless conversation with overtones of “mind how you go”. Now this is no doubt to be accompanied with a demand to “show your papers”.
        This would be slightly more tolerable if it had made any difference to the antisocial behaviour which now simply breaks out as soon as they knock off for the day, or takes place in parts of the loch where they don’t go. I reported an issue at Inveruglas a few years ago and was told by a Ranger that “We don’t go north of the islands”. This was the week somebody stole the door of the disabled bog…
        I believe land based visitors have similar issues. It is ridiculous that the boundaries of the National Park mark an area of Scotland best avoided – the only bit of it where the access rights don’t apply. Fortunately for the moment at least there are alternatives.

  4. The national parks minister, Lorna Slater, needs to remind the Park Board that they are in charge of what happens, not the officers, who appear to think it is the other way round.

  5. So, by “climate change”, do you mean the impending solar minimum, as posited by Zharakova et al, or the world heating up, by the idiot stream media?
    What part of Prof Zharakova’s hypothesis are you struggling with?
    https://youtu.be/LYOMKLDbeYE
    Time was, when all the people thought the world was flat, and that the sun revolved around the Earth because it was declared to be so, by the greater authorities, and this ‘wisdom’ was accepted as fact; it need hardly be pointed out therefore, that merely because many people are ‘led to believe’ that this is the case, this is NOT the same as these glib, asinine runes hold a scintilla of fact. Rather like the “vaccine” débacle now unfolding, thalidomide-like among those too willing to believe in and entrust their future health unto those ‘in charge’ , Twain’s apposite observation, as and when applied to the ‘app’ generation seems rather appropriate: ‘It is easier to fool the people, than to convince them that they have been fooled’. How delicious the irony of the Left being ‘hoist by their own petard’ in their desperate desire to control!

    1. Can I ask what parts of work done by the International Panel on Climate Change that represents thousands of scientists you have problems with? Is it the basic science, the greenhouse effect and how what appear very small increases in CO2 and other gases in the atmosphere trap heat? And how we have been adding to that CO2 by burning fossil fuels?

  6. Heather is an establishment figurehead, “BBC and Gong.” She’ll provide excellent diversionary cover for the “dirty tricks” department. She’ll have the blessing of Rev. Ian Miller, for sure. I haven’t forgotten what he said on behalf of Flamingo Land, especially the yarn about the benefits of inward investment and how that gave rise to the dye works and jobs on the R Leven and several salmon extinction events. I mentioned 90% of their produce was for export, to India, West Africa and the Caribbean. The Brits destroyed India’s textile industry to get rid of the competition. They starved the people and built canals that became a breeding ground for mosquitoes and malaria. There’s an Indian elephant on WDC’s coat of arms. “BBC and Gong” don’t mention the 100s of millions they killed. https://twitter.com/bprerna/status/1599245005457330178?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1599245005457330178%7Ctwgr%5E69e114408d47c5f73c74f3b70b2d60b329091712%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmultipolarista.com%2F2022%2F12%2F12%2Fbritain-100-million-india-deaths-colonialism%2F

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *