Thanks to Phil Swainson, an occasional contributor to this blog, for forwarding me the Guardian’s long read yesterday about how Alpine Ski resorts are using snow making “to battle with climate change” (see here). Its recommended reading for anyone concerned about the future of snowsports at Cairn Gorm or who is concerned about how we tackle the climate emergency, with an explanation of why the Alps are heating faster than elsewhere (20% more sunny days) and a description of how Alpine glaciers are disappearing.
While the impacts of global warming on snow cover are broadly similar to Scotland, with snow lying for shorter periods and increasingly only at higher altitudes (see here), the information in the article has implications on the potential for snow making in Scotland. (And the article acknowledges the inherent contradiction in using energy to make snow to mitigate the impacts of global warming caused by our profligate use of fossil fuels)
“”You need four things to make snow,” Pierre Mattis told me in September as we toured the control centre of the snow-making operation he runs in Val d’Isère. “Water, air, cold and talent.””
In the Alps, even when Spring daytime temperatures may exceed 20C, at night it often freezes down to low altitudes. That makes it possible to create snow for long periods and over large areas by blowing water through snow cannon at high pressure out into the air, a process that uses far less energy than snow factories which have to freeze water to make snow. Snow factories are only meant to supplement traditional snow making. Compare the 65km of piste that can be created with “artificial” snow at Val d’Isere with the snow patch created by the snow factory at Cairn Gorm.
It re-inforces my argument that both Highland and Islands Enterprise and the Cairngorms National Park Authority should have looked at information on temperature and snow lie before deciding to place the energy guzzling snow factory by the Day Lodge (see extract from Strathy above). Snow factories may be justifiable if using renewable energy and if they help keep a resort open but not to create an isolated patch of snow with fossil fuels. They need to be in the right place.
In the Alps resorts have been snow making since the 1980s. What the Guardian article shows is that as the snow retracted, so the Alpine resort operators have responded with investment in snow making capacity. As temperatures rise this is becoming increasingly challenging but, by being inventive and investing early, resorts have survived and got a return on that investment: “Today, 95% of Italian, 70% of Austrian, 65% of French and half of Swiss ski resorts are reliant on snow machines for their continued survival”. Looked at in this context, its hardly surprising Cairn Gorm has been struggling and amazing that the other Scottish resorts have managed to survive at all.
What is scandalous is that Highlands and Islands Enterprise, which is meant to be an Enterprise Agency, has still failed properly to consider the potential for snow making at Cairn Gorm, despite the valiant attempts of the Save the Ciste Group and also failed to develop a sensible short-term plan. The rationale given for purchasing the snow factory was to maintain the Carpark T-bar uptrack throughout the season, enabling access further up the mountain. There is no evidence that staff at Cairn Gorm are attempting to do this or did so last year. At present they continue to widen the patch at the bottom and there’s been no attempt to make snow on the uptrack further up. Inexplicably, the snow cannon that are close enough to the tow to enable this to happen have not been switched on when conditions allow. Where is the talent that Pierre Mattis says is essential for snow making to work?
For snow making at Cairn Gorm to work there needs to be a proper plan based on evaluation of the data on temperature and snow lie. Whatever you may think of Val D’Isere – and I have mixed feelings having skied there but also seen the impacts it has in summer – what they do is thought through and based on science.
It was staff working on Cairn Gorm who were responsible for the removal of the WinterHighland Automatic Weather Station and webcams from the Scottish Ski Club Hut in 2017. That single act of vandalism meant that the temperature data set that had been compiled over a period of 10 years and used to verify the case for snowcannon use was broken……and……we cannot therefore examine present temperature trends to see if that might help to inform us about what is happening with the climate as we go forward. HIE has never apologised for this act or done anything to remedy it. The talent needed to find a way forward at Cairn Gorm, if that is to have any chance of being sustainable, whether environmentally or financially, is going to have to come from outside.
Yet more evidence of the climate issues affecting the snow sports industry in Scotland, and how CMSL continues to lack the talent or motivation to try to efficiently utilise their snow making equipment – all paid for by public money! Unfortunately, HIE and CMSL just ignore what is said. Somehow they need to be held accountable, and if they have arguments to support what they are doing (or not doing) publish them.
Interestingly, I have just had a quick look at the webcams for all 5 of our ski reports. Nevis and Glencoe have limited runs open, Glen Shee is closed, but even the Lecht shows a small beginners’ area. The webcams on Cairn Gorm show no viable snow, just snow cannon pointing onto bare ground. It is possible that their small beginners’ patch still has some snow, but no webcam shows it – yet another mistake by CMSL?
I’m not sure that lack of talent in HIE is completely fair. It must be wondered how many folk actually work in that organisation on the project of Cairngorm. Do the constraints on their ideas and actions come from the upper tier of the organisation or from political masters? I wonder how much of top down policy making is driven by the matter of saving face? Hence the difficulty in ditching the funicular.
Recent posts suggest that Cairngorm could become the ski station to longest survive climate change.
If renewable energy is to be the answer then would not a couple of 2MW turbines at the Ciste car park be the way ahead. No peat destroying roads needed, birdlife already limited by people presence,etc
I’ve seen it suggested that a nearby 0.5MW hydro plant makes a quarter of a million pounds annually for a local estate. It might be a leap to think that wind turbines owned by HIE could generate a couple of million a year but profit surely would be considerable. Then the organisation might be able to be more imaginative, perhaps creating a ski museum on the slopes -“we used to get real snow here, not so long ago”.
But more importantly being an”enterprise”that supports the aims of the Park particularly improving communication infrastructure between the Park’s communities.
Surely it is wrong that so much focus and public cash is being thrown at Cairngorm when so many other greener needs are being neglected.