In the lead up the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) board meeting on 16th September which is due to decide the Flamingo Land Mark III Planning application (see here), I thought it would be worth trying to tell the whole story. Its a long one, so the first part was about the…
Category: Loch Lomond and Trossachs
The importance of outdoor education, the contribution this could make to people’s physical and mental health, safety (eg reducing drowning accidents) and understanding/enjoyment of the countryside, has been regularly discussed in Scotland for 50 years or more but since its heyday in the 1980s provision has steadily decreased. The failure of the Loch Lomond and…
Keir Starmer has been widely reported over the last couple of days in the UK media as being likely to say in a speech today that “things will get worse before they get better” (see here). Whatever the truth of this statement as applied to the economy as a whole, it is certainly not the…
At the start of the week I published the first part of the story about the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA)’s involvement in the proposed Flamingo Land development at Balloch (see here). In the process of checking the evidence for the second part of the story, I came across this important piece…
Following the Herald’s excellent coverage of Flamingo Land’s plans for Balloch at the weekend (see here) – which gave both sides of the “argument” and in which I was pleased to be quoted – it was very good to see the Balloch and Haldane Community Council (BHCC) challenge some of the misinformation being put about…
The story of Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority and the Flamingo Land development (1)
I have written a number of posts over the last seven years about the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA’s) involvement in the proposed Flamingo Land development at Balloch, on the south shore of Loch Lomond, but never put the whole story together. It deserves to be widely known before the LLTNPA Board…
Background The matters arising paper for the June meeting of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) recorded that an ACTION recored in the minute the March meeting, that “SM to look at possibility of organising a site visit to the gold and silver mine at Cononish for Members”, was “closed”. The wording…
One might have hoped that the controversy caused by the office-bearers of the Royal Scottish Forestry Society to try and sell of what was supposed to be a forest for a thousand years at Cashel (see here) and (here) might have caused the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) to reflect on the…
Following my post (see here) on how the Royal Scottish Forestry Society (RSFS) are cashing in on Cashel , Andy Wightman wrote a fine follow up piece on the Cashel estate and the post war labour government. This filled in some of the historical gaps and demonstrated how the public ownership of land was once…
On 16th July the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) issued a news release (see here) stating its board had agreed a date, Monday 16th September, to take a decision on the (Mark III) version (see here) of the Flamingo Land Planning Application. This post will argue that the content of the news release…
On 10th June I wrote to Dr Heather Reid, the Convener of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) asking for a recording of the Board Meeting which took place that day. That request followed a discussion which, in my view, raises yet more serious concerns about the LLTNPA’s handling of the Flamingo…
Last Friday the Cashel Forest Trust, set up by the Royal Scottish Forestry Society (RSFS), announced they had put their property at Cashel on the eastern shore of Loch Lomond on the market at offers over £4,085,000 for the whole or as five separate lots. Goldcrest’s brochure (see here) claims this is an “opportunity…
In a positive move, the local community in Balloch, the site of the proposed Flamingo Land development, have initiated a process to set up a local community development trust which would have the potential to take over some of the land in the village currently owned by Scottish Enterprise (SE) and the Loch Lomond and…
The Flamingo Land planning application and the £2.4m investment Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) staff have agreed at the pierhead, which I considered in my last post (see here), is far from the only important issue facing the National Park Authority which is not on the agenda for the Board Meeting on…
The Flamingo Land planning application & the LLTNPA’s investment programme On 29th April the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) sent a letter (see here) to all those who had commented on the revised Flamingo Land Application advising them that new documents, some of which it had held back for over six months,…
Last Monday, I walked back down Glen Affric from Allt Beithe Youth Hostel and then over to Loch Mullardoch. On the short stretch of public road between the car park and the turn north into Gleann nam Fiadh we passed this lorry with a large metal section of pipe. I guessed at once why it…
On 22nd November the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) issued a news release announcing it was investing £1.6m of Scottish Government funds in its facilities over the winter in order for it to become a “net zero” organisation by 2030. The bulk of the money was earmarked for “retrofitting” the LLTNPA’s HQ…
On 24th April councillors at West Dunbartonshire Council (WDC) decided by a majority vote to accept the recommendation of officers (see here for the committee report and proposed response) and not object to the Flamingo Land planning application at Balloch. This was a reversal of the previous position WDC Councillors had adopted when, in June…
On 5th April (see here), in the newsletter they email to land managers, the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) reported that their National Park Partnership Plan (NPPP) 2024-29 had been approved by Scottish Ministers. There is no mention of this on the “news” section of their website (last item International Women’s Day…
The failed Cononish goldmine & the failures of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority
This post provides a summary of some recent evidence that has emerged about the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA)’s mis-management of the crisis at the mine and some related financial developments. The “regular updates” given to LLTNPA Board Members about Cononish goldmine The Chief Executive’s report to the LLTNPA Board Meeting…
On 6th March “Lomond Banks”, the brand name Flamingo Land uses at Balloch, issued a news release (copy here) announcing it had finalised a Section 48 agreement [under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984] with Transport Scotland under which it would pay for an upgrade to the Stoneymollan roundabout on the A82 should its planning application be…
This post take a look at the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA)’s handling of three recent planning applications and the anomalies therein following Nick Kempe’s post earlier in the week about Inchconnachan (see here). More on Inchconnachan island I attended the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNPA) Planning & Access…
Question: how does France (along with many other European countries) manage to have so much more woodland than Scotland and “do” forestry without fencing and planting? Answer: they control grazing by large herbivores, whether livestock or deer, using completely different legal mechanisms than exist in Scotland The fundamental failing with the legislative proposals in the…
On Friday Planning Democracy published a post (see here) on whether National Planning Framework 4 had made any difference to the degree of protection that is given to nature under Scotland’s planning system as it was supposed to do. This followed an event at the Scottish Parliament, sponsored by Green MSP Ariane Burgess, and the…
In mid-February a small part of tailings stack 2 had been covered in matting. An FOI response from SEPA revealed that the LLTNPA had in December required the whole of the stack to be covered by 13th February to stop sediment entering the river system.(My apologies for lack of formatting etc in this post. It’s…