I have not so far blogged on the long-awaited (see here) masterplan for Cairn Gorm which Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) published last June (see here). Subtitled “Unlocking the potential of the Cairngorm Mountain Estate”, the masterplan is a vague and poorly drafted document: the operator, Cairngorm Mountain Scotland Ltd (CMSL) is to explore “options for new chairlift” (sic) in Coire Cas; HIE is lead on engaging with others “to assess potential for collaborative approach” (sic) to a new Centre for the Mountain Environment to replace the Day Lodge; the Cairngorms National Park Authority is delegated to lead on the delivery of a feasibility study into sustainable transport between Cairn Gorm and Aviemore.
The lack of concrete plans should not surprise anyone. Having committed to spend close on £15m to fix the funicular (see here) – an amount that will have since risen due to the repairs taking a year longer than originally planned (see here) – HIE has little money to invest in anything else at Cairn Gorm. Their announcement on mountain biking (above) needs to be understood within that context.
According to the masterplan HIE was, in years 1-2, going to create a “mountain biking development plan” and then only in years 3-5 seeking planning consent to develop mountain biking activities at Cairn Gorm:
If the planning application is submitted early this year, as claimed, that will be two years earlier than scheduled but without any mountain bike development plan having been made public or consulted on.
The review of the Section 50 Agreement, which prevents summer users of the funicular exiting from the Ptarmigan restaurant onto the Cairngorm plateau, has also been brought forward:
Both are now being described as the “first plank” of the masterplan showing that HIE’s plans really aren’t worth the paper they are written on.
What is being proposed?
The article in the Strathy suggests there will be a number of family friendly 1 km long mountain bike trails between the Day Lodge and the mid-station. While some people might bike up the access road to the trails, the hope is that people will pay to have their bikes carried up on the funicular or the magic carpet.
Using a magic carpet for mountain bike uplift was a new concept for me and I haven’t been able to find any references to them being used in this way elsewhere. Magic carpets are generally quite short, slow moving and used on gently inclined slopes, like the lower Cas. It seems to me any child who is a competent enough cyclist to head down a trail on such a slope is also likely to be able to bike up it – and much more quickly! It would be interesting to know what Developing Mountain Biking in Scotland, whom HIE claim to have consulted closely, think. But in my view it is difficult to see this proposal drawing many families to Cairn Gorm and even if there was demand for such a facility, it’s in the wrong place due to the weather on the mountain.
The use of the funicular for mountain bike uplift raises a different set of issues. Presumably, HIE will remove some of the seating, which is installed in the summer to allow visitors to enjoy the views in comfort, but reduces capacity. Carrying bikes, however, appears likely to reduce capacity even further. Perhaps demand is so low that that won’t matter? But you can see issues where two coach loads of tourists and several families with bikes turn up at the same time. Still, there are funiculars in Europe that carry mountain bikes, so these problems may not be insuperable. But there is still the issue of the mid-station which is egressed by a flight of steps – hardly suitable for children and bikes.
Dave MacLeod was coy about what trails are proposed, stating these will be revealed at the time of the planning application, so it is not clear how many are proposed, what the cost will be and the potential environmental impact.
More intriguing at this stage is HIE’s plan to allow people leave the Ptarmigan restaurant without amending the Section 50 and removing the closed system that was designed to prevent summer funicular users wandering out over the plateau. One wonders if the technology HIE is considering is a form electronic tagging that will allow visitors to walk up the stone steps to the summit of Cairn Gorm and back? Perhaps they are looking at the No Fence system that gives livestock an electric shock when they step over a line? People are so used to being tracked on their phones they will probably accept anything.
Why these proposals?
The most likely reason these two parts of the masterplan have been brought forward is that they potentially offer ways of getting more people to use the funicular. For the last 25 years the funicular and how to attract visitors to use it in summer has driven everything HIE does at Cairn Gorm. Moroever HIE needs to be seen to do something to reduce the anticipated £9.76mthe funicular will lose over the next five years (see here).
Far from being a sign that HIE is about to “unlock Cairngorm Mountain’s true potential” it’s more of the same. That appears to have been confirmed by HIE’s announcement that Susan Smith had been appointed as permanent Chief Executive at the beginning of December (see here), a job she had filled temporarily since 2019. It was Ms Smith who oversaw the disastrous outsourcing of the business to Natural Retreats (see here) and was responsible for the Ciste Campervan debacle last summer (see here). Perhaps she will change now she has the permanent job?
If so, the first thing she should be directing her attention towards is new chairlifts at Cairn Gorm, which would be better than the funicular for both skiers and mountain bikers. The big idea in HIE’s masterplan appears to have been to rebrand Cairn Gorm as a family friendly visitor attraction hence the tube slides, magic carpets, and postage stamp beginners ski area. The whole concept is a terrible idea, not just because we shouldn’t be turning one of Scotland’s finest hills into a theme park, but because of the weather – there are too many bad days. Because of that HIE’s latest big idea won’t work any better than the original which was that summer visitors would throng to travel by funicular up to the top of Cairn Gorm in the clag.
The logical / natural place for mountain biking would be in the Forrest at Glenmore. However that location wouldn’t support the funicular.
If only there was a Glenmore to Coire Cas gondola…..
I think we should allow them to finish the funicular first – get it up and running, which will be good.
I agree with outside access in the summer months – it works at Nevis Range so why can’t it work at Cairngorm ?
The campervan park is probably an experiment at this stage ? To see what demand is like
A bit like Glencoe when they first installed the hobbit huts – see how demand is – improve facilities
The chairlift idea to the top and the cas head wall is flawed, because of the winds ?! How many times during the season will it actually run ?!
More surface based lifts would be better – even replacing the one taken away – like the white lady, Aonoch etc
Developing summer activities is important to attract more visitors and therefore create more employment
Yes there are flaws but can you tell me any government project where there isn’t ??
Yet another example of disjointed business planning by CMSL and its parent HIE. A few years ago they employed a reputable consultant to develop a masterplan after being forced into a public consultation process. They then sidelined this consultant and came up with their own amateur attempt at a masterplan………and then they now decide to make ad-hoc changes to their plan. Nevis Range, which stole a march on them years ago with their well thought through mountain biking strategy must be laughing at these feeble efforts.
The concern is that yet again CMSL will proceed with a piecemeal approach to development and present a planning application to CNPA for a preliminary stage mountain bike track without an overall timed, costed and funded development plan backed by an appropriate environmental impact assessment. This is yet another recipe for disaster – hopefully the CNPA Planning Committee will not swallow it this time.
The answer lies in the design and development of mountain bike trail or trails running from the Day Lodge down to link with the bike trails in Glenmore with appropriate infrastructure support, as long as the environmental impact is acceptable. If HIE really wants to be seen to be economically supporting the area, that’s where the focus should be and not in ploughing yet more public money into the lame duck that is Cairngorm Mountain.
Not that it bothers me in the slightest….but I often wonder if Susan Smith and Keith Bryers……remember him…..”Doggy-Bagged” the Sandwiches and Cakes……..stranded on the Trolley, with Tea and Coffee……..at HIE’s temp HQ, at the old Telephone Exchange, whilst yet more Public Money was being wasted constructing yet another HQ for them at the UHI Campus ! The “spread” was for several representatives from Save the Ciste….Smith and Bryers had finally…..after much work behind the scenes…..agreed to a meeting !! After being addressed with indisputable facts……..Smith denied then lied…..whilst Bryers contributed the occasional combination of smirks and sniggers !! As the atmosphere got more uncomfortable for HIE’s two…..the group from STC were hurriedly ushered out of the Room and finally the Building !! It’s about time more and more realised what it is like to deal with HIE and their Political Masters…..would need four stories to describe meeting with them !!
HIE require to be removed from all direct involvement at CairnGorm and get back to being a development agency that treats all businesses fairly and on an equal footing. Cairngorm benefits from >1m pounds worth of snowmaking equipment that was entirely funded by HIE. At the same time, Glenshee and Glencoe were given 40% grant funding for SF1 Techno Alpin Snow Factories. That’s hardly fair competition although HIE would doubtless argue that it was justified on the basis of economic benefit. They even ignored the findings of a publicly funded consultants report into the benefits of snowmaking that emphasised that HIE should ensure a ‘level playing’ field with respect to funding for snowmaking equipment.
Only the local Community have the knowledge and business expertise to take the CairnGorm business to future success. Until that happens, strong leadership and competent management would be very helpful. The appointment of Ms Smith as permanent CEO raised more than a few eyebrows. She was one of the 2 people within HIE who were principally responsible for the appointment of NR as leaseholders. The HIE Board of Directors were fulsome in their praise of the job that they did to bring NR on board. HIE are now embroiled in litigation against NR. That fact brings into question the judgement of those responsible for their appointment. In addition, the Ciste Campervan Park has clearly been found wanting and that was constructed under her leadership. The CEO will continue to be judged on her record.
It’s difficult to believe that there were no candidates with more comprehensive and up to date management experience and her appointment smacks of cronyism
Call me cynical but the lack of a fully scrutinized ‘master plan’ & associated ‘baby step’ approach is an attempt to disguise the full picture of the environmental damage that will accrue should the plans for what looks like turning the mountain into a theme park come to fruition……CMSL & HIE management seems to continue to demonstrate their ineptitude & the CNPA appear to just be sitting on the side-lines ignoring the many issues.